War Crimes

Printer-friendly version

Share Your Enough Moment

In their forthcoming book, The Enough Moment, John Prendergast and Don Cheadle present the stories of celebrities, activists and survivors who have dedicated their lives to advocating for human rights in Africa. It all begins with an "Enough Moment" -- an experience in your life when you realize you have to stand up, speak out, and organize with others on vital human rights issues in Africa.

The book hits stores Sept. 7, but you don’t have to wait to share your own Enough Moment. We’re interested in hearing your story now, so we’re gathering video versions of personal Enough Moments.

Just begin the video by introducing yourself: Tell us your name, where you live, and what you do. In three minutes or less, describe how you are involved in fighting for human rights in Africa, and the moment in your life that prompted you to take action.

Most importantly, be yourself. Film your video in a simple, natural environment. It's just you, on camera, sharing your story.

Want to see an example? Here's Enough's own Mari Wright sharing her Enough Moment.

When you're finished with your video, upload it to YouTube with the tag "enoughmoment." Please title it “[your name]’s Enough Moment.” For example, John would title his video “John Prendergast’s Enough Moment.” Finally, email the link to us at yourmoment@enoughproject.org.

Later this summer, we'll be launching a special Web site, www.enoughmoment.org, where your video will appear alongside other Enough Moments from celebrities, activists, and survivors.

To learn more about the book and to pre-order your own copy, click here.

Thank you, and we look forward to hearing about your Enough Moment.

Congress Passes Conflict Minerals Legislation

Today, Congo activists, U.S. consumers, and the people of Congo won an incredible victory against long odds. Congress passed the Wall Street reform bill with the inclusion of a key provision on conflict minerals. The conflict minerals language requires companies that use tin, tungsten, tantalum, or gold in their products to file a disclosure report with the Securities and Exchange Commission detailing whether these materials originated in Congo or its adjoining countries. And thanks to you, the bill requires companies to audit these reports to actually prove whether they are sourcing from conflict mines or not.

While passage of the conflict minerals provision is not a cure-all for completely ending the war in Congo, it is a huge step forward. This new law – once it is signed by President Obama – begins to eliminate the source of funding that allows armed militias to continue to terrorize and humiliate communities, cause countless deaths, and commit widespread sexual violence and rape.

While the fight is not over, activists should be very proud of this impressive victory and deserve to relish in this moment. Across the United States, Congo activists, members of the diaspora, and concerned consumers – the growing movement across America that sees the urgency in ending the world’s deadliest war – rallied around the passage of this legislation. They overran the Facebook pages of elected officials, followed up with phone calls, met face-to-face with their representatives, and called on industry leaders to clean up their supply chain.  Senators Sam Brownback (R-KS), Dick Durbin (D-IL), and Russ Feingold (D-WI), Representatives Jim McDermott (D-WA), Howard Berman (D-CA), and Donald Payne (D-NJ), Chairmen Chris Dodd (D-CT) and Barney Frank (D-MA), and many other brave members of Congress also deserve special praise for taking a major step to ending the neglected conflict in eastern Congo. These are just some examples of the creative advocacy that has helped elevate the issue of conflict minerals to reach today’s tipping point.

From the day President Obama signs the bill, the Securities and Exchange Commission will have nine months to promulgate regulations implementing the new law. It will be up to us to ensure that these regulations are as strong as possible. While the jewelry and manufacturing lobbyists were caught off guard by the conflict minerals language and weighed in too late to remove the language, you can be sure industries will fight to make sure the regulations implementing the law are as weak as possible. As this story continues to develop, we’ll be coming to you with new ways of getting engaged. Please stick with us.

Congratulations on today’s exciting victory!

Photo: Tin ore (Sasha Lezhnev)

Bashir’s New Cabinet and the Threat of War in Sudan

The key question looming for all of Sudan remains Khartoum’s response to the impending self-determination referendum for the South, scheduled for January 9, 2011. Sudan’s ruling National Congress Party, or NCP, completely dominates governance in Khartoum, and thus holds the key to peace or war. The NCP cabinet—formed by President Omar al-Bashir in the wake of the April electoral travesty billed as “national elections”—has now been announced, and it offers some ominous clues about the direction in which the NCP is headed.

This new government in Khartoum is as much a reflection of its past as the National Islamic Front, or NIF, as the previous government. Indeed, the appointment of Ali Ahmed Karti as foreign minister in particular signals a clear continuation of ruthless Islamist policies that have been a source of acute tensions between the North and South.  His appointment has already roiled the waters in Khartoum’s relations with Egypt, and can be expected to be a source of real difficulties in relations with the U.S. and E.U.

The cabinet appointments as a whole strongly suggest that the "political space" claimed for northern political actors as a product of recent national elections was mere wishful thinking; certainly the recent sharp crackdown on human rights advocates and the press are consistent with previous policies and those we might expect from this new cabinet. The new NIF/NCP cabinet is also consistent with the most important shift discernible in the balance of power within the ruling elite, namely, that this power rests increasingly within the small circle of presidential advisors, particularly Nafi'e Ali Nafi'e. Nafi’e is the hardest of the “hard-liners” in the regime, and his constituency has been ascendant for several years.

Also of note in this connection is that General Bakri Hassan Salih continues as Minister of Presidential Affairs: He is the former Minister of Defense, and clearly one of those most responsible for the Darfur genocide. He is named prominently in a key Human Rights Watch report from December 2005, identifying those most responsible within the NIF/NCP military and political hierarchy for ethnically-targeted violence in Darfur. The report (“Entrenching Impunity: Government Responsibility for International Crimes in Darfur”) concludes with a two-page list of those who Human Rights Watch believes should be investigated by the International Criminal Court, or ICC. The list includes not only Bakri Hassan Salih, but Saleh Abdalla ‘Gosh’ and Abdel Rahim Mohammed Hussein (see below), former First Vice President Ali Osman Taha, Ahmed Haroun (former State Minister of the Interior), and President Omar Hassan al-Bashir. The last two are indeed wanted by the ICC for crimes against humanity.

The brutal Abdel Rahim Mohammed Hussein continues as Defense Minister. He was previously Minister of the Interior, during the worst years of genocidal destruction in Darfur, and has notoriously pushed for forced returns of internally displaced persons, as well as severe restrictions on humanitarian assistance. Moreover, he is named in a confidential “Annex” to the 2006 report by the U.N. Panel of Experts on Darfur as one of those most responsible for the actions of the janjaweed militias. Sixteen others are named in the Annex, including Saleh Abdalla ‘Gosh’; ‘Gosh’ is the former head of the fearsome National Security and Intelligence Service, or NISI, and presently serves as yet another “presidential advisor.” The confidential Annex reports that 'Gosh' failed “to take action as Director of NISI to identify, neutralize and disarm non-state armed militia groups in Darfur.” He also was accused of “command responsibility for acts of arbitrary detention, harassment, torture, denial of right to fair trial, committed by members of the NSIS in Darfur under his control.”

Here it is worth recalling the largest conclusion of the Panel of Experts in August 2006—more than three years into the genocide—and what this may portend for renewed fighting in southern Sudan, in which the regime would certainly depend heavily on proxy militia forces:

“[We found] credible information that the Government of the Sudan continues to support the Janjaweed through the provision of weapons and vehicles. The Janjaweed/armed militias appear to have upgraded their modus operandi from horses, camels and AK-47s to land cruisers, pickup trucks and rocket-propelled grenades. Reliable sources indicate that the Janjaweed continue to be subsumed into the Popular Defence Force in greater numbers than those indicated in the previous reports of the Panel. Their continued access to ammunition and weapons is evident in their ability to coordinate with the Sudanese armed forces in perpetrating attacks on villages and to engage in armed conflict with rebel groups.” (Paragraph 76)

Much has been made of the appointment of the southerner Lual Deng to head the new "Petroleum Ministry," which has been spun off from the former Ministry of Energy and Mining. In fact, this appointment simply confirms that the accounting books on oil revenues, including those owed to the Government of South Sudan, have by now been thoroughly "cooked." The NIF/NCP has denied the South many hundreds of millions of dollars over the course of the past five years through accounting legerdemain and skewed reporting on extraction totals and locations. The appointment of Lual Deng clearly suggests that no forensic accounting will yield significant insight into the whereabouts of revenues expropriated by Khartoum.

This is a cabinet and security cabal that will strongly support President al-Bashir in any decision to delay, abort, or militarily preempt the southern self-determination referendum. In that sense, it may well be a war cabinet.

 

Eric Reeves is a professor of English at Smith College.  He has published extensively on Sudan, nationally and internationally, for more than a decade.  His book on Darfur—A Long Day’s Dying: Critical Moments in the Darfur Genocide—was published in 2007.

Tiptoeing Around Africa’s Human Rights Abusers

Obama billboard

This post originally appeared on Change.org's Human Rights blog.

The Obama administration rolled out an impressive full afternoon event last week at the State Department, headlined by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, which was very clearly designed to win over an audience of 300+ Africa specialists.

If the sampling of people I spoke to there were representative of the larger group, and I believe they were, there’s a sense of disappointment about President Obama’s limited engagement with the continent. Some pundits, like the New Yorker’s George Packer, point out, “Obama never placed democracy and human rights at the center of his foreign policy.” But President Obama’s well-regarded speech in Ghana last year certainly raised these expectations.

However, the briefing didn’t alleviate these concerns about the Obama administration’s follow-through, at least not on the conflict mitigation/prevention front.

Among my colleagues at the Enough Project and our partner organizations working on some of the most egregious human rights abuses, there is a particular frustration about the Obama administration’s hesitancy to criticize or use pressure to influence some of the continent’s most repressive leaders. Certainly after the policies of the Bush administration, the trend toward humility and respectful engagement is refreshing. But where’s the red line? So far, the Obama administration has been shockingly tolerant of backsliding on human rights issues and disrespect for democratic values, seemingly favoring policies that maintain the status quo rather than push for bold reforms.

Take the volatile Horn of Africa, for instance. The United States has good relations with most governments in the region, which is a useful diplomatic tool. But as Somalia expert Professor Ken Menkhaus aptly pointed out at a House subcommittee hearing recently, many of these governments are despised by their own people. The United States risks undermining the renewed good graces that the Obama administration ushered in if the U.S. government doesn’t using its leverage to push these “partners” to reign in corruption, address impunity rampant among security forces, allow press to report freely without fear of retribution. (I could list specific countries for each of these abuses, but this paragraph would get awfully long.)

Click here to continue reading.

 

Photo: Billboard honoring President Obama in Ghana (AP)

White House Blog Picks Up LRA Bill Signing

The White House’s Office of Public Engagement recently published a blog post about the ceremony held last week where President Obama signed into law the Lord’s Resistance Army Disarmament and Northern Uganda Recovery Act. The post includes a photo taken in the Oval Office of President Obama and the guests invited to the signing ceremony, including Enough Co-founder John Prendergast and representatives of our partner organizations, Invisible Children and Resolve Uganda.

Starting from the day the bill was signed, the Obama administration has 180 days to devise a strategy for eliminating the threat posed by the Lord’s Resistance Army in central Africa and bolstering efforts to protect civilians.

The signing ceremony represented a major victory for the tens of thousands of activists around the United States who mobilized to push the LRA bill through Congress. Getting the bill to President Obama’s desk was no small feat – just ask the students who camped out in front of Senator Coburn’s office in Oklahoma for 11 days last winter – but the advocacy work is far from over. Attention must now be focused on ensuring that the strategy put forth by the administration is designed to effectively neutralize the LRA leadership, encourage lower level LRA fighters to defect, help abducted children in the LRA ranks return to their homes, and assist communities terrorized by the LRA rebuild.

The New, Not-Necessarily-Improved MONUSCO

Lots of changes – some substantial, others cosmetic – are afoot for the world’s largest peacekeeping force, the nearly 21,000-strong U.N. mission in Congo, or MONUC. Bowing, in part, to the demands of Congolese President Joseph Kabila, the U.N. Security Council has voted to drawdown the force by 2,000 peacekeepers by the end of June, conditioning further withdraw of peacekeepers on the Congolese government’s ability to meet certain security requirements.

President Kabila initially said that he wanted to see MONUC withdraw from the country by Congo’s 50th anniversary of independence on June 30, and then revised the deadline, calling for foreign forces to be off Congolese soil in time for the presidential election in October 2011. Critics have been quick to note the convenience of having 19,000 U.N.-affiliated eyes out of the country in time for Kabila’s re-election bid and a vote that is widely expected to be contentious.

Speaking to reporters following the Security Council vote last Friday, U.N. peacekeeping chief Alain Le Roy explained the significance of the mission’s name change, from MONUC to MONUSCO, which stands for the Organization Stabilization Mission in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – stabilization being the operative word. "He wanted the international community to acknowledge they have entered a new phase," Le Roy said. "We acknowledge that the situation has improved," he said, but he added that the situation in eastern Congo remains perilous. “We are not able to protect every single citizen,” he said.

Indeed, while MONUC operates under a Chapter VII mandate, granting the peacekeepers the right to “take necessary action” against potential assailants to protect civilians, rights groups, including Enough, have documented numerous occasions in which armed groups have deliberately targeted civilians within close range of peacekeepers.

Congo expert/blogger Jason Stearns boiled down the changes in MONUSCO’s mandate into a bulleted list, and he included some insights about Security Council politics prior to passage of the reauthorization resolution: “China is trying to remove many of the concrete suggestions for how to protect civilians, as well as the conditionality of supporting the Congolese army. The Americans are pushing strongly for protection of civilians (but not security sector reform), while Austria is pushing on strong language on security sector reform. Uganda - wonder of wonders - didn't see the need to say that sexual violence was ‘widespread.’”

Alarmingly, though not surprisingly given President Kabila’s recent appeals toward state sovereignty, the final resolution passed by the Security Council emphasized the role of the U.N. to “support,” act “upon explicit request from,” and “assist” the Congolese government on fronts ranging from training its army, to helping displaced people return home, and preventing armed groups from benefiting from the East’s lucrative mineral resources. Of course, the catch-22 of this plan is that the Congolese soldiers are themselves one of the major predators threatening civilians and exploiting mineral wealth in the region. One Congolese commander, Bosco Ntaganda, is wanted by the International Criminal Court for war crimes. In another serious indictment, the latest Group of Experts report, leaked to the press late last week, identified government agencies levying illegal taxes at various stages of the mineral trade. With this track record it’s difficult to be optimistic about the willingness of Congolese state and military authorities to initiate the meaningful reforms that need to occur.

Along with the mandate changes, which take effect on July 1, MONUSCO will also have new leadership, as head of mission Alan Doss recently announced his retirement. French diplomat Jean-Maurice Ripert’s name has been floated for the post. Ripert is currently serving as the New York-based U.N. special envoy to Pakistan.

 

Photo: MONUC peacekeepers in eastern Congo (IRIN)

LRA’s Decapitation Can’t Come Soon Enough

“This may seem odd coming from someone who works for a peace institute, but… the only way to stop [Lord’s Resistance Army leader Joseph] Kony is to capture him and kill him.”

So said theologian David R. Smock of the U.S. Institute of Peace. Yeah, it’s that bad.

Fortunately, on Wednesday night, the House of Representatives passed legislation aimed at targeting this African war criminal and designated terrorist. It now goes to the president’s desk for signature. The success of this legislation is due in large part to grassroots effort that has mobilized young people across the U.S. to the cause of ending the LRA’s atrocities.  

As I have written before, the decapitation of the LRA couldn’t come soon enough. One, it's the moral policy given the horrendous atrocities - new recruits, often drugged, are forced to rape their mothers, kill their parents and eat their victims – the LRA has committed over the past two decades. Truly, hell on earth. Second, the LRA's continued existence almost guarantees regional instability.

As I said on the House floor on Wednesday night, the LRA’s objectives are threefold: kill, capture, and resupply for its next pillage. How has this group survived so long? One researcher put it this way: “Put simply, the LRA’s fortuitous combination of murky international alliances, child soldiers, and bumbling enemies has proved stronger than any military offensive over the last 20 years.”

The abduction and use of child soldiers is difficult to combat. But we can sever its ties with outside groups and bolster those on Kony’s trail. 

Kony has long battled the government of Uganda. For that he has had the support of the Islamist government in Sudan, which wanted to hit back at Uganda's leader for supporting Christians and animists in southern Sudan.  Former LRA commanders report that Khartoum provided ammunition, intelligence training, and medical care.

More recently, there have been credible reports of the LRA gaining sanctuary in Darfur. A referendum on southern Sudan’s secession is set to take place early next year; and Darfur remains insecure. Unless the LRA is permanently dealt with now, Khartoum may very well put this killing squad to use.

The Ugandan army and others in the region have struggled with the LRA. Importantly, the bill passed last night calls for the provision of military and intelligence support to neutralize Kony and his commanders. Targeted assistance from the U.S. could tip the scales. This legislation should spur the Obama administration into devising a strategy to make this happen. Congress will have to crack the whip, aka “oversight,” to make sure they have their thinking caps on and aren’t blinded by their engagement with Sudan. 

Stopping Kony won’t happen without making sure that his ties to Khartoum are cut and that those taking aim at him have what they need. His removal won't guarantee peace -- but it sure won’t hurt.

Rep. Ed Royce (R-CA) is a senior member of the House Foreign Affairs Committee and former Africa Subcommittee chair. He also writes a blog, Foreign Intrigue, on national security issues. 

Human Rights Leader Samantha Power on the Life of a U.N. Icon

Vieira de Mello - Wikimedia Commons

This post originally appeared on Change.org’s Human Rights blog.

If Samantha Power — who was a Pulitzer Prize-winning author, acclaimed journalist, and popular Harvard lecturer on human rights before becoming a close advisor to President Obama — says that she has a story to tell about a “man of action and a man of reflection,“ who had “a thirty-four-year head start in thinking about the plagues that preoccupy us today,” we would all do well to listen.

The story of longtime U.N. diplomat Sergio Vieira de Mello has become a centerpiece of Power’s public discussions on the importance of the U.S. taking a principled stance on human rights in its foreign policy, the shortcomings of the United Nations, and how to confront, or better yet prevent, mass atrocities and genocide. From her book Chasing the Flame grew the film “Sergio” by director Greg Barker, which after making the rounds at international film festivals, debuted on HBO last week. Following the screening, Power and Barker joined a public conference call moderated by a veteran of African conflict zones, John Prendergast.

Their candid conversation, which lasted well into the night, is a rare gem, and I wanted to draw attention to it today. You can listen to this podcast after the jump, at the bottom of this post.

When Sergio Vieira de Mello died in the rubble of the bombed out U.N. compound in Baghdad, the United Nations lost one of its most experienced and talented diplomats. Power eloquently described how she channeled her grief over his death into an effort to examine and immortalize his legacy. And she found that, beyond simply an intriguing biography, the tragedy of Vieira de Mello’s death was a metaphor for the vexing, even debilitating, challenges the United Nations faces around the world.

Power first met Sergio Vieira de Mello when their paths crossed in eastern Europe in 1994. She was a young journalist covering the war in the former Yugoslavia and Vieira de Mello was a top U.N. diplomat dispatched to work on ending it. Though it would be another 10 years until Power began researching Vieira de Mello’s life for the biography, she recounts their first dinner meeting with a level of detail that conveys the significance of those first impressions. He was “a cross between James Bond and Bobby Kennedy,” she wrote.

Vieira de Mello did indeed travel with the headlines of the day; a timeline of significant dates over the last 30 years of the U.N.’s history mirrors the major promotions and moves of Vieira de Mello’s career since he was 21. As he rose through the U.N. ranks, he continuously reflected on his decisions from both a philosophical and a practical standpoint. As Power wrote in Chasing the Flame:

At the start of his career he advocated strict adherence to a binding set of principles. (…) He was deeply mistrustful of state power and of military force. But as he moved from Sudan to Lebanon to Cambodia to Bosnia to Congo to Kosovo to East Timor to Iraq, he tailored his tactics to the troubles around him and tried to enlist the powerful. He brought a gritty pragmatism to negotiations, yet no amount of exposure to brutality seemed to dislodge his ideals.

At times, Vieira de Mello’s approach flirted with moral lines, such as when he chose to negotiate directly with the Cambodia’s Khmer Rouge while the rest of the world isolated the genocidal regime, and certainly he was responsible for his share of mistakes. But the profile Power paints is of a leader who challenged himself to translate failures into lessons. He understood that his engagement — the U.N.’s engagement — would not always, or perhaps even not often, move mountains. But he understood that even a small improvement made the effort worthwhile. Vieira de Mello personifies Power’s concept of an upstander, someone who doesn’t simply stand by when injustices occur.

It’s remarkable to have the chance to hear Samantha Power, a woman many people regard as a hero in her own right, describe the inspiration she found in one of the fallen heroes of our time. Listen to this podcast; the lessons she draws from Vieira de Mello’s life are central to the work all of us do as human rights advocates.

You can download the entire podcast by right-clicking here and selecting "Save as."

Photo: Sergio Vieira de Mello (Wikimedia Commons/Agência Brasil)

LRA Attacks Hamper Aid Delivery in Central African Republic

On May 6, a group from the Lord’s Resistance Army attacked a truck in Mbomou prefecture in the Central African Republic on the main national road connecting the remote southeastern town of Obo and the capital of Bangui, 750 miles apart. According to sources on the ground who spoke to Enough, three people died and two were severely wounded. The truck, hired by the World Food Program, had delivered food to Congolese refugees and internally displaced people in Mboki and Obo and was on its way back to Bangui when it was attacked by the rebels. The attack took place between the towns of Dembia and Rafai, close to the village of Guerekindo.

This is the not the first time vehicles were attacked in Guerekindo. On April 3, a commercial truck travelling from Bangui to Obo was attacked on the same spot by a large LRA group. Eight people were believed to have been killed, although the real number remains unclear as many were burned when rebels set the truck ablaze. At least two more people are still suffering from serious wounds. One of the injured has a bullet lodged in his chest and is in critical condition. Enough sources in the town of Zemio say that the number of people killed on April 3 might exceed 10.

LRA attacks targeting vehicles travelling on national roads in CAR have been frequent. A similar attack took place on September 21, 2009 when a truck belonging to the Italian non-governmental organization COOPI was attacked between Mboki and Obo. There were seven people in the truck, which was carrying construction materials for a school in Obo. According to two surviving witnesses, one person was shot during the attack while two others, including the driver, were killed later by the LRA. Of the four remaining passengers, one 10-year-old boy was released while the other three were assigned to different LRA groups. One of the abducted, a 14-year-old boy, tried later to escape but was caught and killed by an LRA commander. “The LRA commander crushed his skull with a big club,” one of the surviving witnesses told Enough.

The attack on the COOPI truck and the subsequent attacks targeting vehicles travelling on national roads have caused a state of paralysis in the Haut Mbomou and Mbomou prefectures in the Central African Republic. Humanitarian aid, already limited before the arrival of LRA groups in January 2009, has been severely affected. The World Food Program delivered food to over 5,000 Congolese refugees in Zemio, Mboki, and Obo months after it had promised to do so. Insecurity was the primary reason, and the attack of May 6 will certainly delay badly needed aid for much longer.

Trapped in towns, unable to harvest their produce from their fields for fear of LRA attacks, the population of Haut Mbomou and Mbomou are now deprived of the only remaining way to secure food and aid – from the Bangui road. “The situation is dire,” a source in Mboki told Enough by telephone. “We are facing starvation and need help urgently.”

However, the CAR government has shown little interest in addressing the conflict choking a region more than 600 miles from the nation’s capital. Rumor has it that a CAR government official from the interior ministry who happened to come across the injured in Guerekindo on May 6 returned to Bangui and made an impassioned speech calling for help from the government – and French commandos – to pursue the rebels and assist the civilians in areas targeted by the LRA. He was apparently immediately demoted.

A Report Card for Sudan

UPDATE: Read a blog post by Enough's Laura Heaton on the report card, up today on Change.org's Human Rights blog.

An independent review by six leading human rights and Sudan advocacy groups, including Enough, reveals that the Sudanese peace processes for Darfur and southern Sudan show no significant progress. They are at best stagnating and at worst backsliding toward complete failure and a return to full-scale, national war.

The report released today, “A Benchmark Report Card for Sudan,” analyzes 28 leading indicators of progress, concluding that 17 indicators show significant worsening of the situation on the ground, while the remaining 11 indicators show a stalemate.

Here’s the snapshot:

“The report card for Sudan reveals an absence of progress,” commented Enough’s John Norris. “This clear-eyed, transparent, and independent analysis makes painfully clear how much work remains to be done and how dire the situation remains on the ground. The administration indicated it would apply pressures if the parties failed to make progress. Well, the parties have slowed to a halt and are sliding backward in critical areas.”

One of the key indicators – the recent elections in Sudan – was reportedly marred by fraud, censorship, and voter intimidation. Now the regime in Khartoum is certifying as winners candidates such as Janjaweed leader Musa Hilal – who should have never been allowed to run for office in the first place.

The Report Card demonstrates that, despite the initially encouraging signs that the administration was committed to seeing verifiable change in Sudan, there has been a lack of change since the administration’s policy was put into place. President Obama should empower Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Ambassador to the U.N. Susan Rice to personally step up and make sure that the regime in Khartoum is held accountable for a lack of progress and for backsliding away from peace.

TAKE ACTION NOW:

Email your senators at http://action.savedarfur.org/campaign/benchmarkse to ask that President Obama, Secretary of State Clinton, and U.N. Ambassador Rice be directly involved in the full implementation of the Sudan policy and be ready to respond with multilateral pressure when Sudan’s dictator Omar al-Bashir fails to make progress towards peace.