Omer Ismail

Sudanese Vice President Urges U.N. to Reject Arrest Warrants

Date: 
Sep 28, 2010

Voice of America

Sudanese Vice President Urges U.N. to Reject Arrest Warrants

But Sudanese-born Omer Ismail of the Enough Project says the U.N. should not fall for what he calls Khartoum's blackmail

By: James Butty

Sudanese Vice President Ali Osman Taha has called on the United Nations to reject the International Criminal Court (ICC) arrest warrant against President Omar al-Bashir for allegedly masterminding a campaign of genocide in Sudan’s Darfur region.

Addressing the ongoing General Assembly session in New York Monday, Mr. Taha said the involvement of the ICC is a threat to the peaceful settlement of the Darfur conflict.

Sudanese-born Omer Ismail, senior policy advisor for the Enough Project, an advocacy organization set up to highlight Darfur crisis, told VOA the international community should not fall for what he called Khartoum’s blackmail.

“The indictment by the International Criminal Court came as a result of the behavior of the government of Sudan and its president, (Mr.) Bashir. So, he’s coming now to blackmail the world basically and saying that the government will either get their way in delaying justice. Otherwise, they are not going to invest a penny in Darfur,” he said.
 

Read the rest of this article at Voice of America

ADVISORY: 2nd in series of press briefings on Sudan elections features Director of African Centre for Peace and Justice Studies

Date: 
Apr 12, 2010
Author: 
Jonathan Hutson

Contact:
Jonathan Hutson, the Enough Project, 202-386-1618, jhutson@enoughproject.org
Mame Annan-Brown, Genocide Intervention Network, 347-564-2936, annan-brown@genocideintervention.net
Andrea Clarke, Save Darfur Coalition, 202 460 6756, andrea@savedarfur.org
Julia Thornton, Humanity United, 650-587-2030, jthornton@humanityunited.org
Susan Morgan, Investors Against Genocide, 617-797-0451, susan@paxcommunications.org

Please note: Photography and broadcast quality recent b-roll from IDP camps are now available for general use at http://media.savedarfur.org/save-darfur-media-epk-download and http://www.flickr.com/photos/savedarfur/sets/72157623816650366/. Photography of Monday’s student protest at the State Department is available at http://www.flickr.com/photos/genocideintervention/sets/72157623715411721
 

ADVISORY: Second call in series of press briefings on Sudan elections by human rights organizations features Director of African Centre for Peace and Justice Studies

 

WASHINGTON, D.C. – In an effort to provide journalists with timely commentary on the latest developments in the pivotal Sudan elections, leading human rights organizations have launched a series of press briefings hosted by Sudan Now, a campaign led by several of the participants. Tuesday’s call will include Osman Hummaida, executive director of the African Centre for Justice and Peace Studies. The African Centre for Justice and Peace Studies is dedicated to promoting human rights and the rule of law in Sudan through ongoing monitoring of human rights violations in the country and promotion of legal reform. The group has been tracking violations of electoral procedure and incidents of irregularities committed by the National Elections Commission (NEC) and officials present at polling centers.

Sudan Now’s press calls are being held each day this week at 10 a.m. Eastern Time. The calls are largely devoted to questions from journalists after very brief opening statements from the guest speakers. Additional organizations participating in Tuesday’s call include the Save Darfur Coalition, the Enough Project at the Center for American Progress, Genocide Intervention Network, and Humanity United.

According to the Sudan Now campaign, the current implementation of the U.S. policy on Sudan has not addressed a number of extremely concerning developments including clear indications that the national election will be neither free nor fair, ongoing government attacks that have killed hundreds and displaced thousands in recent months, and ongoing obstruction by the Government of Sudan in access for aid workers and UN investigators to Darfur.

WHEN:
Tuesday, April 13 through Friday, April 15 at 10 a.m. Eastern Time (daily)

WHO:
Osman Hummaida, Executive Director, African Centre for Justice and Peace Studies
Omer Ismail, Advisor, the Enough Project at the Center for American Progress
Mark Lotwis, Acting President, Save Darfur Coalition
Sam Bell, Executive Director, Genocide Intervention Network
David Abramowitz, Director of Policy and Government Relations, Humanity United

DIAL IN NUMBER:
US/Canada Dial-in #: (877) 210-8943 – Conference ID # 68487901
Int'l/Local Dial-In #: (706) 902-0621 – Conference ID # 68487901

####

Sudan Now is a campaign led by a group of anti-genocide and human rights advocacy organizations committed to bringing meaningful and lasting peace to Sudan and encouraging strong American leadership and action to achieve this goal. The campaign challenges President Obama and top U.S. administration officials to live up to their promises to take strong and immediate action to help end the international crisis in Sudan and bring a lasting peace to Sudan’s people. Organizations participating in the campaign include Humanity United, the Enough Project at the Center for American Progress, Genocide Intervention Network, Stop Genocide Now, and Investors Against Genocide.

 

The Darfur Peace Process: Recipe for a Bad Deal?

Date: 
Apr 6, 2010

 

Enough Project & Center for American Progress

For Immediate Release
April 6, 2010

Contact
Jonathan Hutson, 202-386-1618
jhutson@enoughproject.org

REPORT: The Darfur Peace Process: Recipe for a Bad Deal?

Read the report.

WASHINGTON, D.C. Even as violence continues in the Jebel Marra area of Darfur, negotiators in the Qatari city of Doha are attempting to hammer out a peace deal for this western region of Sudan. While some observers have hailed these talks between rebel forces and the Government of Sudan as a major breakthrough, there are numerous reasons why enthusiasm should be tempered argues ‘The Darfur Peace Process: Recipe for a Bad Deal?,’ a short report from the Enough Project at the Center for American Progress.

Enough’s report on the Doha peace process builds upon an update that Enough released at the start of negotiations. Close monitoring of the highly fluid Doha peace process over the past month reveals a dramatic disconnect between the deal brokering in Qatar and the reality of violence on the ground in Darfur. Sudanese President Omar al-Bashir’s declaration that “the war in Darfur” is over cannot be taken at face value.

There is tangible evidence -- including the fact that the army is pursuing an offensive in Jebel Marra --that Sudan’s ruling National Congress Party, or NCP, continues to negotiate in bad faith, the strategy paper notes. The Government of Sudan has a strong interest in appearing conciliatory, not least because it hopes to legitimize itself in time for the elections now just days away, but its actions on the ground have worsened in recent weeks. Furthermore, tensions within and among rebel groups, fragile and shifting alliances, and a lack of transparency have characterized the Doha negotiations to date.

“The Doha process is hampered by backroom deals that put the Sudanese government in a strong, omniscient position while rebel groups jockey for temporary advantages, with little consideration for how their lack of unity leaves them collectively susceptible to government manipulation,” says Enough Project Advisor Omer Ismail, who travels regularly to the region. “With so many players clamoring for short-term gains without comprehensive knowledge or long-term outlooks, I fear we will see a replay of the 2006 Abuja talks’ failure.”

“There is much in the recent talks to suggest they are not built for success,” says John Norris, the Enough Project’s Executive Director. “The current Doha process replicates many of the exact same mistakes of earlier failed agreements at a time when the international community, frankly, should know better.”

Read ‘The Darfur Peace Process: Recipe for a Bad Deal?’.

####

For additional information:

VISIT the Enough Project's blog, Enough Said, for updates on this issue.
FOLLOW the Enough Project on Twitter, http://twitter.com/enoughproject.

The Center for American Progress is a nonpartisan research and educational institute dedicated to promoting a strong, just and free America that ensures opportunity for all. We believe that Americans are bound together by a common commitment to these values and we aspire to ensure that our national policies reflect these values. Enough is a project of the Center for American Progress to end genocide and crimes against humanity. Founded in 2007, Enough focuses on crises in Sudan, Chad, eastern Congo, northern Uganda, Somalia, and Zimbabwe. Enough’s strategy papers and briefings provide sharp field analysis and targeted policy recommendations based on a “3P” crisis response strategy: promoting durable peace, providing civilian protection, and punishing perpetrators of atrocities. Enough works with concerned citizens, advocates, and policy makers to prevent, mitigate, and resolve these crises. For more information, contact Jonathan Hutson, jhutson [AT] enoughproject.org, 202-386-1618.

If you would rather not receive future email messages from Center for American Progress, let us know by clicking here. Center for American Progress, 1333 H St. NW, Washington, D.C. 20005-4707 United States.

Genocide in Darfur: How Sudan covers it up

Date: 
Mar 1, 2010
Author: 
John Prendergast and Omer Ismail

Most governments don’t acknowledge it. The Sudanese president dismisses it. Darfurians demand that it be recognized. Academics, activists, and lawyers dispute whether it is still occurring or whether it occurred at all. International Criminal Court (ICC) judges debate standards of evidence surrounding it. The nature of recent attacks this past week by Sudanese government forces and militia allies against defenseless civilians potentially augurs its resurgence. And if a fledgling peace process continues to move forward, then any evidence of it ever happening may well be swept under the rug.

The “it” in question is Darfur’s genocide. Seven years after a small rebellion in western Sudan by Darfurian insurgents unleashed a massive counter-insurgency strategy by the Sudanese government and its Janjaweed militia allies, the debate continues: What should be done about the genocide? How can justice and peace simultaneously be pursued?

Continue reading here.

OPEN LETTER: Truth and Consequences for Sudan Now

Date: 
Jan 21, 2010
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
 
Contact
Eileen White Read, 202.641.0779
eread@enoughproject.org
 

OPEN LETTER: Truth and Consequences for Sudan Now

 

WASHINGTON, D.C. – This week senior U.S. Government officials will meet to review Sudan policy. In an open letter to President Barack Obama's deputies, the Enough Project makes the case that Sudan is dangerously close to sliding back to war and recommends a course of action marked by much deeper diplomatic engagement, backed by more assiduous efforts to build a multilateral coalition of countries willing to impose consequences on those undermining the path to peace in Sudan.
The letter is signed by Enough’s Co-founder, John Prendergast, and Policy Advisor Omer Ismail.
Enough is a project to end genocide and crimes against humanity at the Center for American Progress.

Earlier this week, Enough and eight other Sudan advocacy groups called upon the Obama administration to apply firm benchmarks to Sudan to prevent much broader conflict in a major policy paper. Click here to read the paper. In addition, Sudan Now, a coalition of Sudan advocacy groups, ran a new advertisement in the Washington Post. Click here to view the ads.

The following is the text of the letter:

TRUTH AND CONSEQUENCES FOR SUDAN NOW:
AN OPEN LETTER TO PRESIDENT OBAMA’S DEPUTIES

 
JANUARY 20, 2010
 
To:               
Tom Donilon, National Security Council
Jim Steinberg, Department of State
Stuart Levey, Department of Treasury
Michèle Flournoy, Department of Defense
Erica Barks-Ruggles, United States Mission to the United Nations
 
From:              
John Prendergast, Co-founder, The Enough Project
Omer Ismail, Senior Advisor, The Enough Project
 
At the first quarterly review of Sudan policy by the Deputies Committee, you will likely sense two very different assessments of what is happening in Sudan today. This divergence of opinion has major implications for your policy recommendations and decisions. One version of Sudan’s current reality will highlight recent agreements on the referendum law, high rates of voter registration, and the lack of village burnings and cross-border adventurism in Darfur as demonstrations of tangible progress in Sudan.
 
The reality on the ground in Sudan speaks in starkly different terms. The dangerous status quo in Darfur remains unchanged in some key aspects: millions of people are left in squalid camps, unable to return home because government-supported militias occupy their land and make travel very dangerous. Women face high levels of sexual violence in Darfur, aid is erratic, and progress in the Darfur peace process remains painfully limited.
 
More broadly, the April national election in Sudan – an election for which the Unites States has provided tens of millions of dollars in technical assistance – is in the process of being stolen by an indicted war criminal who will use the ballot to “legitimize” his rule. The conditions to make the national election free and fair simply do not exist, and will not exist, by April, and there may well be sharp questions as to why the United States heavily bankrolled an election so obviously flawed.
 
Most urgently and ominously, there are abundant indicators that Sudan is on a dangerous road back to full-scale North-South war as violence increases and key elements of the Comprehensive Peace Agreement (CPA) have been left completely unimplemented. The international community’s position toward Sudan at this vital time reflects neither consensus nor coherence. Officials from both North and South speak of not wanting war, but are intensively preparing for it. Local clashes in South Sudan are escalating, against an historical backdrop of extensive support to southern Sudanese militias by the ruling party in Khartoum designed to undermine southern unity. The heavy lift of diplomacy needed to assure that Sudan’s referendum is peaceful and well managed simply remains largely undone, with no full-time, on-the-ground diplomatic teams from the U.S. engaging the regional actors on either the North-South issues or the Darfur process.
 
To prevent a full-scale war from erupting in Sudan in the coming year, the Deputies should recommend to their superiors and President Obama a course of action marked by much deeper diplomatic engagement, backed by more assiduous efforts to build a multilateral coalition of countries willing to impose consequences on those undermining the path to peace in Sudan.  On the occasion of this first quarterly policy review, we urge you to consider three main actions:
 
1)    The Deputies should recommend that diplomatic efforts begin immediately in New York and in capitals to pull together a coalition of countries willing to pressure the parties multilaterally to take the steps necessary for peace. Those officials and parties undermining peace should face specific and clear consequences. At this juncture, that would also involve withdrawing further U.S. financial support for the April election, expanding and more effectively implementing the current arms embargo, identifying specific officials who are undermining peace and targeting them with aggressive asset freezes and travel bans, and denying the Khartoum regime any form of multilateral debt relief until peace agreements have been far more effectively implemented.
 
2)    The Deputies should recommend that the U.S. immediately deploy a small team of diplomats to be based in Sudan and the surrounding region to work full-time on the peace processes for Darfur and the CPA. Trips by the envoy, no matter how frequent, are no substitute for on-the-ground, around-the-clock diplomacy. The team should include senior diplomats with real experience in peace processes and existing familiarity with Sudan.
 
3)    The Deputies should recommend a ministerial level meeting among North American and European diplomats on Sudan at the earliest possible juncture. The lack of a common position on the multiplicity of profound issues facing Sudan over the coming year – including serious post-referendum issues – must be addressed.
 
We want to personally thank you for all of the work that you continue to do to advance U.S. national interests and the cause of peace in Sudan, and thank you for your consideration.
 
John Prendergast             
Omer Ismail 
####
 
Enough is a project of the Center for American Progress to end genocide and crimes against humanity. Founded in 2007, Enough focuses on crises in Sudan, Chad, eastern Congo, northern Uganda, Somalia, and Zimbabwe. Enough’s strategy papers and briefings provide sharp field analysis and targeted policy recommendations based on a “3P” crisis response strategy: promoting durable peace, providing civilian protection, and punishing perpetrators of atrocities. Enough works with concerned citizens, advocates, and policy makers to prevent, mitigate, and resolve these crises. For more information, please visit www.enoughproject.org; media contact: Eileen White Read, 202.641.0779, eread@enoughproject.org

 

Truth and Consequences for Sudan Now: An Open Letter to President Obama's Deputies

In this letter to the Deputies Committee, the Enough Project pushes for a course of action marked by deeper diplomatic engagement and a willingness to impose consequences on those undermining the path to peace in Sudan.

A Political Settlement for Darfur: A Practical Roadmap

The Darfur peace process is at a crossroads. Until now, the mediation team has not produced a credible peace proposal and key external actors have not generated the necessary pressures and incentives to achieve an agreement.


Advocacy Groups Press Obama Administration for Tougher Approach - allAfrica.com

Date: 
Sep 11, 2009

U.S. advocacy groups concerned about Sudan are calling on President Obama to reverse course on his administration's strategy for dealing with the crisis in the Darfur region and conflict between the north and south. In a letter to the President this week, the advocacy groups called the current approach "fundamentally flawed."  In an interview, two prominent leaders of the campaign, John Prendergast and Omer Ismail, both part of the ENOUGH Project, explained why they disagree with the administration's approach and what they believe U.S. policy towards Sudan should be.

Read the interview here.

Film Star Don Cheadle and Poker Champion Annie Duke Raise $600,000 for Ante Up For Africa

Date: 
Aug 10, 2009

 

 

 

Contact: Ante Up for Africa
support@anteupforafrica.org
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:

 

 

FILM STAR DON CHEADLE AND POKER CHAMPION ANNIE DUKE RAISE $600,000 FOR ANTE UP FOR AFRICA

CELEBRITY POKER TOURNAMENT DONATIONS WILL BENEFIT THREE DARFUR ORGANIZATIONS THAT RELIEVE SUFFERING AND FUND ADVOCACY

LOS ANGELES (August 10, 2009) ---- Ante Up For Africa, a non-profit organization founded by Academy Award® nominee Don Cheadle, World Series of Poker champion Annie Duke and Norman Epstein with a goal of raising money and awareness for Africans in need, today announced a donation totaling $600,000 to three Darfur-related charities dedicated to helping provide relief for the people affected by the violence in that area.  Proceeds were raised through the organization’s highly successful poker tournaments, which have raised more than $2.5 million for Darfur charities since launching in 2007.

“The crisis in Darfur is not over and we’re grateful to all who participate in Ante Up For Africa to make these donations possible and hope that many more people will join us in the future," said Don Cheadle.
 

“When we started Ante Up, we had no idea that so many people would respond and participate to combat the devastation in Darfur,” said Annie Duke. “It reaffirms our belief in humanity and drives us to do more for people in need.”

Ante Up for Africa will donate $300,000 to Darfur Peace & Development Organization (DPDO), a Darfuri-led non-governmental organization that continues to provide aid to those in need in Darfur and the refugee camps.  This donation will allow the DPDO to continue the Women’s Center in the Kassab refugee camp in North Darfur.  It will also provide the money necessary to complete the construction of El Fasher High School for war-affected teens. 

“The impact of these funds will be felt for many years as we try to bring some normalcy to those who have not known it for a long time,” said Omer Ismail, a co-founder of DPDO.

Ante Up For Africa will also donate $150,000 to Refugees International, an organization that advocates for lifesaving assistance and protection for displaced people. This donation will allow Refugees International to conduct assessment missions to South Sudan looking at the protection of women and returning refugees and to work with policy makers to increase aid and services in the region.

Elaine Martyn, Director of Development for Refugees International said, “We are grateful to Ante Up for Africa for their generosity in helping us urge greater support for victims of violence in all of Sudan.”

Ante Up For Africa is also donating $150,000 to the Enough Project, a project of the Center for American Progress that is working to build a permanent constituency to prevent genocide and crimes against humanity.  This donation will support the field researchers on the ground in Darfur, administer advocacy programs and implement advocacy campaigns directed to spur greater action the U.S. government and others.

"Ante Up's support for Enough allows us to work on addressing the root causes of the suffering in Darfur, so the war and genocide can finally come to an end and Darfur's displaced populations can go home in peace and security," said John Prendergast, co-founder of Enough.

Darfur, located in western Sudan, is experiencing a humanitarian crisis which has seen hundreds of thousands killed and millions driven from their homes.  Ante Up For Africa’s contributions have gone to leading aid organizations to relieve suffering as well as fund advocacy on behalf of people affected by the violence. 

ABOUT ANTE UP FOR AFRICA
Ante Up For Africa is a non-profit organization founded in 2006 by Don Cheadle, Annie Duke and Norman Epstein dedicated to raising money and awareness for Africans in need.  (www.anteupforafrica.org)

ABOUT DARFUR PEACE & DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION
Darfur Peace & Development is a non-profit, non-sectarian organization with headquarters in Washington, DC and offices in Khartoum and El Fasher Sudan.  DPDO provides humanitarian and development assistance to the victims of conflict in Darfur, Sudan without regard to ethnicity, gender, age or religious beliefs.  DPDO works to foster reconciliation, to facilitate just governance and to enable Darfurians to rebuild their homeland in effective, sustainable ways. DPDO also promotes awareness of the crisis in the United States and advocates for a peaceful resolution of the conflict. (www.darfurpeaceanddevelopment.org)

ABOUT REFUGEES INTERNATIONAL
Refugees International advocates for lifesaving assistance and protection for displaced people and promotes solutions to displacement crises. Refugees International was started in 1979 as a citizens’ movement to protect Indochinese refugees.  Since then, they have expanded to become the leading advocacy organization that provokes action from global leaders to resolve refugee crises.  They do not accept government or UN funding, allowing our advocacy to be fearless and independent. Their expert recommendations are highly valued by the very people whose decisions bring immediate relief and lifesaving solutions to refugees: senior officials of the U.S. Administration, the United Nations, and governments around the world, and members of the U.S. Congress. (www.refugeesinternational.org)

ABOUT THE ENOUGH PROJECT
Enough was conceived in 2006 by a small group of concerned policymakers and activists who wanted to transform their frustration about inaction into pragmatic solutions and hope. Co-founded by Africa experts Gayle Smith and John Prendergast, Enough launched in early 2007 as a project of the Center for American Progress. John Norris is Enough’s Executive Director. Enough conducts intensive field research in countries plagued by genocide and crimes against humanity, develops practical policies to address these crises, and shares sensible tools to help empower citizens and groups working for change. Their initial work has focused on grave challenges in a number of African countries: Sudan, eastern Congo, northern Uganda, Somalia, Chad and Zimbabwe. (www.enoughproject.org)

###
 

Policy Prescription: Chad is Essential to Comprehensive Sudan Peacemaking Mix - Voice of America

Date: 
Jul 28, 2009
Author: 
Howard Lesser

As committees in both the U.S. Senate and House of Representatives prepare to hold hearings this week on U.S. policy toward Sudan, a newly released strategy paper argues that conflict resolution efforts in Chad are essential to achieving an end to the Sudan crisis.

In its findings, the Enough Project says there has to be a strategy to deal with Chad’s authoritarian governance and state weakness that it indicates have kept the country and the region unstable. Enough Project policy adviser Omer Ismail says that without an end to the constant cross-border volley of attacks against each others' regimes, a durable, comprehensive peace for the region cannot be achieved.

Continue reading here.

To listen to the MP3, click here.

Syndicate content