Categories
Conflict Areas
Blog Series
Our Campaigns & Initiatives
Announcements
Archive
- February, 2012 (17)
- January, 2012 (53)
- December, 2011 (55)
- November, 2011 (69)
- October, 2011 (51)
Blog Roll
- Africa in Transition
- Africa24 Media
- Across the Aisle
- Burning Billboard
- Change.org - Human Rights
- Chris Blattman's Blog
- Condition Critical
- Congo Siasa
- From the Front Line
- Genocide Intervention Network
- Huffington Post
- ICC Observers
- IJCentral
- Impunity Watch
- In Situ
- Institute for War & Peace Reporting
- Opinio Juris
- Meskel Square
- Mia Farrow
- National Security Network Democracy Arsenal
- Nicholas Kristof, The New York Times
- Promise of Engagement
- Pulitzer Center - Untold Stories
- Resolve Uganda
- Save Darfur
- South Sudan Info
- STAND
- SudanReeves.org
- TakePart
- Think Progress
- UN Dispatch
- Voices from the Field
- Voices on Genocide Prevention
- War Crimes
- WITNESS
- Woodrow Wilson Center
- World is Witness
- Wronging Rights
Sudanese Regime Crackdown Requires Int'l Crackdown On Sudanese Regime
Today's vivid protests and arrests of senior SPLM politicians by Khartoum police clearly demonstrate that the U.S. should not be financing Sudan's electoral charade unless the laws are amended to allow for the basic requirements of a credible election.
It was fanciful of the United States and other donor nations to think that the ruling National Congress Party, or NCP, which has ruled Sudan with an iron fist and tolerated no peaceful dissent, would suddenly loosen its grip and allow peaceful elections and their necessary precursor: peaceful freedom of assembly.
As I testified last week before the Africa and Global Health Subcommittee of the House Foreign Affairs Committee:
Until the parties agree to conditions that will allow a credible election, the United States and broader international community should suspend all electoral assistance. Non-credible elections should not be financed and legitimized by American taxpayers. The parties should agree to delay the election until these CPA-mandated conditions exist, because the U.S. and international community should not recognize any election that does not meet basic standards.
President Obama should recognize that any benchmarks-based policy of incentives and pressures will have no credibility unless consequences are imposed immediately when such an obvious benchmark like today's denial of a basic element of the existing North-South peace deal -- freedom of assembly for the elections -- has been violated.
Read Enough's latest report on Sudan, What To Do About Sudan Now.
Photo: Woman demonstrates in opposition rally. (AP)









"Sudan's electoral charade"??????
Err, 14 million-plus Sudanese who have registered - enthusiastically - to vote at the polls don't seem to agree with you, John....
See this link for more info: http://sudantribune.com/spip.php?article33400
Time to give up the ghost of regime-change, John, methinks. We here live in the "real Sudan" - not the one shaped by this and other stuff in the blogosphere, the "virtual Sudan".
John: a question: why don't you just let Sudanese decide that (to NCP or not NCP)from themselves with a standard, handy little device just around the corner??? Elections!
Does your voice, influence - or views -on the election matter more for concerned Americans than nearly 15 million (total eligible electorate approx 20 mill) Sudanese???
It's very sad if they do.
Roll on April 2010!!!
PS: if an incumbent is as genuinely unpopular as you claim the NCP is in Sudan, that will surely come through at the results of the polls - no matter how much the playing field is stacked against the opposition; see Zambia (Chiluba in mid-1990s); Kenya (Kbaki in 2002); Zim (MDC this year) and numerous others around the world.......
Yours,
Ibrahim Adam
El Fasher,
North Darfur,
Sudan