Blog Series
Categories
Our Campaigns & Initiatives
Announcements
Archive
- May, 2012 (33)
- April, 2012 (62)
- March, 2012 (64)
- February, 2012 (53)
- January, 2012 (53)
Blog Roll
- Africa in Transition
- Africa24 Media
- Across the Aisle
- Burning Billboard
- Change.org - Human Rights
- Chris Blattman's Blog
- Condition Critical
- Congo Siasa
- From the Front Line
- Genocide Intervention Network
- Huffington Post
- ICC Observers
- IJCentral
- Impunity Watch
- In Situ
- Institute for War & Peace Reporting
- Opinio Juris
- Meskel Square
- Mia Farrow
- National Security Network Democracy Arsenal
- Nicholas Kristof, The New York Times
- Promise of Engagement
- Pulitzer Center - Untold Stories
- Resolve Uganda
- Save Darfur
- South Sudan Info
- STAND
- SudanReeves.org
- TakePart
- Think Progress
- UN Dispatch
- Voices from the Field
- Voices on Genocide Prevention
- War Crimes
- WITNESS
- Woodrow Wilson Center
- World is Witness
- Wronging Rights
Home › Enough Said ›
A Sudan Policy Review with Life or Death Implications
Posted by John Prendergast on Jul 30, 2009
The Obama administration is in the midst of a contentious review of its Sudan policy, which was the subject of three hearings on July 29 and 30 on Capitol Hill. The outcome of the debate will help determine the future of millions of people from Sudan and the surrounding region.
At the July 29 Africa Subcommittee hearing, members heard a bipartisan critique of the current direction of U.S. policy towards Sudan. Rich Williamson, Roger Winter and I all have negotiated extensively with the regime in Sudan, have roughly a combined six decades in working on or in Sudan, and have a very clear idea of what is required for lasting peace to have a chance in that embattled country.
This hearing comes at a moment in Sudan’s history fraught with danger and potential. There is no effective peace process for Darfur, but one could be built with U.S. leadership. The CPA is on the brink, but could be salvaged if U.S. engagement deepens. Next year’s elections are at risk, but could become an important opportunity to strengthen opposition parties and democratic structures crucial for the referendum and for Sudan’s political future. The referendum itself is doubtful, but its prospects could be enhanced with a credible international roadmap.
The major unknown variable that will help determine whether the dangers or the opportunities get maximized is the unresolved internal debate over the direction of U.S. policy towards Sudan. In the absence of any agreement on the policy, U.S. diplomatic engagement has been energetic, for which Special Envoy Scott Gration should be credited.
But the substance of this robust engagement has been fraught with missteps, lack of internal coordination, and an overall aversion to pressuring the ruling National Congress Party (NCP). Sustained pressure leveraged by meaningful and focused sticks is the principal tool that has moved the NCP to change its behavior during the twenty years of its authoritarian rule. This substantial track record of empirical evidence of the value of pressure makes the direction of U.S. diplomacy all the more questionable.
In fact, Special Envoy Gration has stated that “right now we are looking at carrots and looking proactively.” That is the wrong message to be sending the NCP. They will eat those carrots and continue with the deadly status quo in Darfur and the South.
There is also a broader inconsistency in U.S. foreign policy when it comes to Sudan. The Obama administration has resolutely worked to craft more formidable international coalitions to isolate North Korea and Iran for important U.S. policy objectives. However, the U.S. is not doing the same for Sudan, despite the existence of a regime there that is responsible directly or indirectly for the loss of two and a half million lives in the South and Darfur.
A Better Way Forward for U.S. Policy
In the context of its policy review, President Obama should spell out a clear path forward for U.S. policy, consistent with the positions that he has taken previously as a senator and presidential candidate, and also consistent with positions taken in their previous incarnations by Vice President Biden, Secretary Clinton, and Ambassador Rice.
1. U.S. leadership in constructing a more effective Darfur peace process, using as a model the process that led to the CPA involving a lead role for the U.S. and a multilateral support structure that provided international leverage, expertise, and support;
2. U.S. leadership in supporting the implementation of the CPA, continuing the trend of deeper engagement over the last few months but structuring clear penalties for non-implementation of any of the key provisions;
3. U.S. leadership in supporting the democratic transformation of Sudan by supporting the electoral process, providing institutional support to opposition parties and civil society organizations, and building the capacity of the Government of Southern Sudan;
4. U.S. leadership in preparations for the South’s referendum in 2011, which will be a make-or-break process for the future of both North and South.
5. U.S. leadership in support of accountability. The ICC indictment of President Bashir is a crucial opportunity to address the cycle of impunity that has fueled some of the worst war crimes in the world. Sweeping violent history under the rug ensures its continuation.
The essential word that repeats throughout all these goals is “leadership.” U.S. leadership – multilaterally and when necessary unilaterally – will be an enormously influential ingredient in a successful transition to peace and democracy in Sudan.
But success will require greater leverage than that which presently exists. The debate internally within the U.S. government in part rests on the degree to which incentives or pressures ought to be favored instruments for changing the behavior of the Sudanese regime, the Darfur rebels, and the GOSS. It is the view of this panel and the activist organizations that comprise the Darfur movement that the way forward should involve deeper diplomatic engagement that is rooted in multilateral pressures and the credible threat of significant consequences for policies or actions by Sudanese parties that undermine peace efforts and lead to worsening humanitarian conditions.
In the absence of these pressures, and if incentives are all that are put forward, then failure is guaranteed. For example, the U.S. appears more interested in negotiating the implementation of the provisions of the CPA that have already been painfully negotiated, rather than marshalling the international coalition necessary to pressure the parties to implement what they have already agreed.
Success will also require the construction of credible and effective processes that allow for the achievement of U.S. policy goals. First and foremost, the glaring lack of an effective peace process for Darfur calls out for greater U.S. leadership in constructing from the existing elements a revitalized process that has the chance of ending Darfur’s war. Secondly, the U.S. should intensify its early efforts to revive the CPA and back these efforts with the construction of clear multilateral consequences for violations or non-implementation of key elements of the deal.
The bottom line is that there must be consequences for committing atrocities and for undermining peace. An incentives only strategy will guarantee failure.









There is no existing effective peace process for Darfur that's why the US Government came into place and did the leadership. This leadership should help revive the CPA. - Jonathon Budd
Here we show you the three best Melbourne DJ weddings parties anything for music production in which professional DJs as Armin Van Buuren, DJ Tiesto and even amateurs use this software to take their first steps as they are very intuitive.
The trend informed buyer has grown fickle along with the increased complex of the many different trends and styles of saskia clothing within the fashion sector, is indicative of the informed nature of consumers today.
The tool contains a sequencer, various synthesizers, sample libraries, drum machines, etc. This allows the artist to create music based on patterns, using the Step Sequencer and the Piano Roll view, to later organize them in the "playlist".
The effects panel located on the mixer (mixer) provides access to a variety of effects Melbourne DJ software, whose knobs and faders can be automated
Les aspirateurs industriels peuvent être achetés dans tous les magasins d'aspirateurs. Ils sont puissants et leur réservoir peut contenir beaucoup de déchets et poussières. Les industries les utilisent énormément pour nettoyer les zones de débris solides ou liquides.
Un humidificateur d'air bébé permet à votre enfant de respirer de l'air pur et propre. Les filtres de ces appareils doivent être changés fréquemment pour éviter la formation de moisissure et bactéries.
L'utilité nettoyeur ultrason est de laver et nettoyer vos bijoux et tous les autres objets fragiles et qui nécessitent la dissolution de saleté et l'apparition d'une brillance.
This is Sudan's policy right? Why is America involve in this matter? Shouldn't this be a Sudan problem only? If it's the interest of US to help the Sudan government, then fine. But it would be better if they let the Sudan government to decide for their people.
Best,
Andy J.
Buying Bad Loans Seminar
Dear John,
Your report is insightful and very interesting.
The strength of your comments are only undermined by the fact that the US isn't the only country to which they should be applied. We need unified leadership from all the world powers on this one. The US has a bad track record for 'interfering' in African affairs, and this is used as an excuse for ignoring and defying international law. This needs to come from the UN. It must be multilateral.
Thanks for your unwaivering pressure on this issue, we can't let it continue.
Thank you for this.
I believe Gration is the wrong person for this job.
Thanks for this. I like reading about this stuff and anything associated to it. I definitely want to read more on your blog soon. online advertising website
United States policy will also acknowledge that the Government of Southern Sudan (GoSS) must also abide by its responsibilities under the terms of the CPA, and prioritize conflict mitigation and resolution, capacity-building, transparency and accountability, and service delivery marketing