Conflict Areas
Blog Series
Announcements
Archive
- February, 2012 (16)
- January, 2012 (53)
- December, 2011 (55)
- November, 2011 (69)
- October, 2011 (51)
Blog Roll
- Africa in Transition
- Africa24 Media
- Across the Aisle
- Burning Billboard
- Change.org - Human Rights
- Chris Blattman's Blog
- Condition Critical
- Congo Siasa
- From the Front Line
- Genocide Intervention Network
- Huffington Post
- ICC Observers
- IJCentral
- Impunity Watch
- In Situ
- Institute for War & Peace Reporting
- Opinio Juris
- Meskel Square
- Mia Farrow
- National Security Network Democracy Arsenal
- Nicholas Kristof, The New York Times
- Promise of Engagement
- Pulitzer Center - Untold Stories
- Resolve Uganda
- Save Darfur
- South Sudan Info
- STAND
- SudanReeves.org
- TakePart
- Think Progress
- UN Dispatch
- Voices from the Field
- Voices on Genocide Prevention
- War Crimes
- WITNESS
- Woodrow Wilson Center
- World is Witness
- Wronging Rights
Books by John Prendergast
Prendergast in WSJ: Lead On Sudan, President Obama
With just 128 days to go until southern Sudan votes in a referendum that will likely split the country in two, Sudanese officials and international mediators and stakeholders are entering the final stretch of time in which to stave off potential mass violence that a messy divorce could bring about. In an op-ed in today’s Wall Street Journal, Enough’s John Prendergast describes the influential role that the United States played in helping to usher in the 2005 peace deal that ended the long war between North and South and set the stage for next year’s historic choice.
“This all makes the Obama administration's efforts in Sudan nothing short of head-scratching,” Prendergast wrote. Well-publicized disagreements on how to implement U.S. policy toward Sudan have undermined the ability of the United States to positively influence preparations for the likely separation and promote peace in the country. Prendergast wrote:
It's true that internecine battles are par for the course in the shaping of foreign policy. The real problem here is that the decider hasn't decided. The absence of presidential clarity has left allies confused and the Sudanese regime gleeful.
At last, a decision memo is winding its way through the system to President Obama's desk. The hope is that in the very near future he will make some clear decisions about U.S. policy. The most pressing question is how the U.S. and the international community can convince the various parties in Khartoum, the South and Darfur to abandon violence.
The full piece is available online by googling “Obama Is Still AWOL on Sudan.”
Photo: President Obama and Sudan Special Envoy Scott Gration (AP)
God, its so upsetting theres so many atrocities going on in Darfur and too few people know about it! The NY International Film Festival gave its award of Best International Film to Attack on Darfur a few weeks ago. Finally! A movie that puts the audience face to face with reality! Something has to be done, and this movie is a step in the right direction.
What Prendergast's editorial in the WSJ fails to highlight is that the reason Bush made Sudan (and sex trafficking and other human rights issues) a priority is because it was a high priority of the Christian Right. You may not like them for much, but when it comes to stuff like Sudan, the Christian Right has been the one that put it on the Presidential radar. Then, contrast Bush's willingness to piss off anti-American authoritarian regimes with Obama's desire for America to be liked and no regime to be demonized. Sudan going on the back burner with limp wristed diplomacy was practically a given. Lastly, Obama is not the Decider at all, he's the Considerer -- Bush was lampooned as the Decider. We may not have liked his decisions, but Bush certainly was the Decider Bush, sometimes data and reason by damned